Tuesday, September 11, 2007

That’s Not a Beer in my Pocket, Dad…I’m Just Really Happy to See You…?

I have a very unique relationship with deception. If you are looking for evidence of this—which I am sure you all are because I am just such an interesting individual—ask any female I have ever had any “relationship” with. Now you may be saying to yourself, “O brother, not another lying man, what a pig!” However, you would be dead wrong because, on the contrary, I am brutally honest—a trait which gets me in just as much trouble as lying—trust me! I wasn’t always doomed to a permanent residence in every female’s “doghouse” due to my brutal honesty. Conversely, when I was a young little Mathew, I was a deception fiend. I lied about everything from saying it was my brother who urinated in the tire swing to saying it was my brother who urinated on the patio furniture—I guess I had a fascination with urinating on things but evading blame. All the lying finally caught up to me and my guilty conscience, creating the honest man writing this blog for you today. My brutal honesty does not go over well with the ladies, but it does provide for wonderfully applicable stories concerning communication theory, deception, and media selection. So here goes…
One faithful high school night, I felt like “balling out”—like the youth these days call it—and planned on bringing some brewskies for my boys. Not really putting much thought into the plan, I just tried to stroll out the front door with my tense grin and my incredibly unsuspicious giant plastic bag clanging and jangling full of beer. As you could imagine, I didn’t get very far before my father, the much honored Bruce Lloyd Birnbaum, asked, “Uh…..Whatcha got there Matt?” Immense beads of sweat swelled up on my brow and began falling to the ground like hundreds of miniature, moist, bombs. Excuses and ideas began flying through my extremely nervous teenage mind like: Just say they are Snapple bottles and run for it; you can take this old man! As my mouth began to move in accordance with my voice box to say this wonderfully crafted lie, there must have been some malfunction within my brain. What came out of my mouth sounded more like, “It’s…BEER!” To make a long story short, I was NOT the beer supplier that faithful high school night. My inability to effectively deceive my father can be attributed to the form of media involved in the interaction. In accordance to O’Sullivan’s Impression Management Model (IMM), I would have preferred to select a leaner medium to increase ambiguity opposed to a richer medium. In my situation, the locust—self—and the valence—negative because of underage drinking—would, according to the hypothesized interaction effect, support my preference of a more mediated channel of communication. Perhaps, if I was able to interact with my father’s inquiry of the contents of my “beer bag” through a leaner, more mediated channel of communication, I would have made it successfully to my friend’s house, with the “goods.” Luckily for my dad, I had not taken this class yet or known about O’Sullivan’s IMM, so the score board reads: DAD: 1, Matt and COMM 245: ZERO!
Another instance where media selection can be beautifully instrumental is…the Booty Call, yes, I said it. I don’t care who wants to admit it or not, many of us have been on both the initiating and receiving end of the beloved booty call. Based on personal experience, I would say that the preferred method of communication concerning booty calls are text messages opposed to richer mediums such as FtF or phone calls. This media selection situation epitomizes the Media Richness Theory (MRT) which asserts that there should be an optimal match between the equivocality of the communication task and the richness of the medium. Frankly put, the less equivocal the message, the leaner the medium could be. What intended message could be less equivocal than, “Get over here, I want to Kiss you.” Since the communication tasks related to booty calls are very simple and uncomplicated, most people choose the lean medium of text messaging to carry out the interaction. If you don’t believe me or agree, the next time you are lonely on a late weekend night, try walking to your “friend’s” door and asking face to face, “Want to be used?”

5 comments:

Rachel Newman said...

First of all, I just wanted to say that your post was fun to read due to your topics chosen and humorous comments. I also was able to relate to it because when I lie to my parents I choose the leanest medium possible. I am not a great liar and when I am telling them my lies face to face they tend to ask too many questions, making me flustered and ultimately unable to pull off my lie successfully or without casting some suspicion on my whereabouts. For me in this situation, the Media Richness Theory also applies because I want to be as vague as possible, not having to worry about remembering details. Therefore, I choose to use a leaner medium to allow for this open ambiguity.

Anthony Gonzalez said...

This must have been one of the most enjoyable posts I have read all semester. I also remember time and time again trying to deceit and lie to my parents FtF which never worked. I soon learned writing notes was so much easier and actually worked. This is a perfect example of O'Sullivan's theory. The richer medium is easier to detect lies and increases the intensity of the conversation.
Sending a text message for a booty call is also a good example of using lean medium. This type of medium is perfect for less equivocal tasks. All your doing is setting up a meeting time so there is no need for a big conversation. This further proves O’Sullivan’s theory of Media Richness Theory.

Robin Luckow said...

First, I just wanted to let you know that your post was hilarious and enjoyable to read because I found it very easy to relate to. However, I have mixed opinions about the “booty call” situation. I agree with you that in this type of situation if you are trying to send someone an unequivocal message such as the example you gave saying “Get over here, I want to Kiss you” the preferred method of communication would be text messages because you are using a less equivocal message in a lean medium. However, if you send a “booty call” message to someone at 2 in the morning but this time saying “What are you doing?” you might want to send the message through a richer medium such as a phone call because it is more ambiguous to what exactly you want from that person. Either way, I agree with you that this media selection situation epitomizes the Media Richness Theory (MRT).

Eric Dial said...

Matthew, absolutely hillarious dude. Awesome post! I too have been confronted by the parents while I was trying to get out with the goods and it ended just like your situation did. I would have preferred a less rich medium. For example, when I was at my friends house I CALLED my parents to let them know that I was "tired" and was just going to spend the night. Over the phone my parents can't see my guilty face! As long as my voice is confident and they are reassured that I'm "tired," I was home clear. Damn that FTF!

Jenna Holloway said...

I have to admit, I had never heard of a booty call before, so, alas, I had to look it up on urban dictionary.:

----------
booty call

A late night summons -- often made via telephone -- to arrange clandestine sexual liaisons on an ad hoc basis.

i.e.;

The student's mother was ignorant of her son's booty calls.

---------

Anyway. I digress. First of all kudos on your post. Quite funny if I do say so myself. The only thing I would say is that if you can figure out how to automatically transform yourself into "leaner modes" of communication at times when you've been stuck with face to face accusation, let me know. :) It would be nice to have a little button that zooms you into the internet for some quality IMing. ;-)

I think the intensity of your conversation was quite fitting for the osullivan model though, so I congratulate you on your analysis.

Cheerio.