The dimensions of the relation among core members suggests that Fanclub is a “community of practice”: the mutual engagement of members, the shared endeavor (promoting music), and the shared routines, concepts of music, and manners are considered by Wenger to define this type of community (1998). Core members participate in several modes of interaction, including email, telephony, face-to-face discussion, and text-messaging; engagement via multiple modes of communication suggests stronger ties between core members, a concept summarized in the term media multiplexity (Haythornthwaite and Wellman 1998). The synergy between CMC and offline meetings is vital for the participation of members on various levels: actively, in the booking/promoting process, or passively, in attending the concert (or attending the Facebook event). Both core and peripheral members are united most basically by common ground—the group was born out of and continues to exist because of its members’ appreciation of experimental, alternative, and independent music.
Reciprocity, a necessary glue for healthy interpersonal communities, is exhibited on the personal level and macroscopically on the network level. The officers ask of members to be diligent in responding to emails requesting help during concerts or in the process of booking bands. In return for their investments—time commitment in response to officers’ requests—diligent members enjoy an appreciation for their skills and a satisfaction from their sense of belonging. The sum of personal reactions creates social capital shared by the greater network, “beyond those obtained from pairwise interactions”; this capital (e.g., live music) is shared by all members and weak social ties related to the Fanclub Collective (Haythornwaite 2007). Peripheral members and weak social ties also participate in reciprocity: in return for the services or money, they enjoy exciting music in the
“Bridging ties between subgroups” is vital to the maintenance of the Fanclub community because of Fanclub's reliance on school funding, and community attendance and participation (Haythornwaite 2007). The network would simply collapse without the weak social ties’ and peripheral members’ drive for reciprocity.
Would you like to reciprocate?
SIC ALPS will play a devilish show this Saturday, Oct 27th, @ NO RADIO RECORDS.
1 comment:
Hey Andrew, great post. I think you picked a good community to discuss because of the online/offline synergies that exist within the group, and the role that these synergies play in keeping the community functioning well. You went into great depth in discussing the SNA attributes, and explained your thoughts really well by using support from the readings. The group seems to rely on the common ground aspect, and that the online communications seems to be just as important as the offline communications in keeping your weak ties secure. I found the same thing in the discussion of my community. So after your analysis of the Fanclub community, would you say it's more of a Gemeinschaft effect? Seems so to me. Great post!
Post a Comment